Alternation and Bounded Concurrency Are Reverse Equivalent

Numerous models of concurrency have been considered in the framework of automata. Among the more interesting concurrency models are classical nondeterminism and pure concur-rency, the two facets of alternation, and the bounded concurrency model. Bounded concurrency was previously considered to be similar to nondeterminism and pure concurrency in the sense of the succinctness of automata augmented with these features. In this paper we show that, when viewed more broadly, the power (of succinctness) of bounded concurrency is in fact most similar to the power of alternation. Our contribution is that, just like nondeterminism and pure concurrency are \complement equivalent", bounded concurrency and alternation are \reverse equivalent" over nite automata. The reverse equivalence is expressed by the existence of polynomial transformations, in both directions , between bounded concurrency and alternation for the reverse of the language accepted by the other. It follows, that bounded concurrency is double-exponentially more succinct than DFAs with respect to reverse, while alternation only saves one exponent. This is as opposed to the direct case where alternation saves two exponents and bounded concurrency saves only one. An immediate corollary is that for languages over a one letter alphabet, bounded concur-rency and alternation are equivalent. We complete the picture of succinctness results for these languages by considering the diierent combinations of the concurrency models using additional lower bounds.